Substrate Fe(110) | Medium 1 M HCl | DFT level B3LYP/6-311++G(d,p) (ddCOSMO:water) | Generated 2026-07-18 18:23
The molecules modelled here are screened in silico as representative candidates, not a verified analysis of any real sample. Confirm the actual composition experimentally (e.g. by LC-MS/GC-MS) before drawing firm conclusions.
1. Overview
corrosim pipeline
2. Summary & ranking
Of the 3 molecules screened, quercetin ranks highest on the composite electronic score (+0.70), which averages three independent axes — a small HOMO–LUMO gap (3.59 eV), the Lukovits ΔN and the molecular dipole — the strongest all-round electron-donating profile of the set. It adsorbs flat on Fe in the physisorption regime (E_ads ≈ -16 kJ/mol). The lead holds across all 4 descriptor bases evaluated (geometry and protonation). This is a computational screening prediction requiring electrochemical confirmation (see the Method section and caveats).
Quercetin
Isorhamnetin
Kaempferol
Gap (eV)
3.594 ✓
3.666
3.682
ΔN
0.191
0.226
0.182
Dipole (D)
8.021
3.468
6.143
E_ads (kJ/mol)
-15.97
-16.74 ✓
-16.55
Fe–O (Å)
3.25
3.15
2.95
Score
0.698 ✓
-0.133
-0.565
Ranking basis
Top candidate
force-field geometry, neutral
Quercetin
force-field geometry, pH-weighted
Quercetin
DFT-relaxed geometry, neutral
Quercetin
DFT-relaxed geometry, pH-weighted
Quercetin
Lead robust: the same candidate tops all 4 descriptor bases (geometry and protonation).
Scored on three independent axes of the canonical basis (DFT-relaxed geometry, pH-weighted; z-scored; higher = stronger): the HOMO–LUMO gap, the Lukovits ΔN (electron donation to the metal) and the dipole (a weak tie-breaker — its direction vs efficiency is disputed). The geometry / protonation panels below are a sensitivity check, not separate rankings. E_ads and the Fe–O distance validate the lead, they do not enter the score. Full method: docs/pipeline.md.
3. DFT electronic descriptors
Modelled moleculesFrontier-orbital energies vs the metal work function
Sensitivity: descriptors on the DFT-relaxed geometry (the geometry axis of the ranking ensemble). The headline ranks on the canonical basis; see the Summary.
Optimised protonated cations (in-acid)
Descriptor
Kaempferol+H+
Quercetin+H+
Isorhamnetin+H+
Formula
C15H11O6+
C15H11O7+
C16H13O7+
HOMO (eV)
-6.601
-6.477
-6.269
LUMO (eV)
-3.188
-3.214
-3.261
Gap ΔE (eV)
3.413
3.263
3.008
η hardness (eV)
1.707
1.631
1.504
σ softness (1/eV)
0.586
0.613
0.665
χ electronegativity (eV)
4.894
4.846
4.765
ω electrophilicity (eV)
7.018
7.196
7.547
ΔN
-0.022
-0.008
0.018
E_back-donation (eV)
-0.427
-0.408
-0.376
Dipole (D)
TNC
-4.205
-4.754
-7.044
3.5 Species in the acidic medium (protonated cation)
Descriptor
Kaempferol+H+
Quercetin+H+
Isorhamnetin+H+
Formula
C15H11O6+
C15H11O7+
C16H13O7+
HOMO (eV)
-6.881
-6.668
-6.427
LUMO (eV)
-3.277
-3.324
-3.295
Gap ΔE (eV)
3.604
3.344
3.132
η hardness (eV)
1.802
1.672
1.566
σ softness (1/eV)
0.555
0.598
0.639
χ electronegativity (eV)
5.079
4.996
4.861
ω electrophilicity (eV)
7.157
7.465
7.546
ΔN
-0.072
-0.053
-0.013
E_back-donation (eV)
-0.451
-0.418
-0.391
Dipole (D)
TNC
-4.014
-4.438
-4.993
Protonated +1 cation descriptors in 1 M HCl; a component of the pH-weighted canonical basis (see the Summary), shown here on its own.
3.6 Speciation in 1 M HCl (pH ≈ -0.0)
97% neutral / 3% protonated at this pH — the neutral form dominates. Population-weighted descriptors (the speciation axis of the ranking ensemble; the headline ranks on the canonical basis):
DFT level: B3LYP/6-311++G(d,p) (ddCOSMO:water). Global descriptors come from the frontier-orbital energies via Koopmans' theorem; ΔN uses the metal work function with η(metal) = 0. The Monte-Carlo and Brownian-MD stages use a classical van-der-Waals adsorption model — a physics-based screening surrogate, not a substitute for periodic DFT or for electrochemical validation. The composite ranking is a heuristic that orders candidates; it does not prove inhibition. Full methodology: docs/pipeline.md; validation record: docs/validation.md.