Substrate Cu(111) | Medium 1 M HCl | DFT level B3LYP/def2-SVP (ddCOSMO:water) | Generated 2026-07-18 19:37
The molecules modelled here are screened in silico as representative candidates, not a verified analysis of any real sample. Confirm the actual composition experimentally (e.g. by LC-MS/GC-MS) before drawing firm conclusions.
1. Overview
corrosim pipeline
2. Summary & ranking
Of the 5 molecules screened, pyrazolylnucleoside methoxy ranks highest on the composite electronic score (+1.66), which averages three independent axes — a small HOMO–LUMO gap (5.46 eV), the Lukovits ΔN and the molecular dipole — the strongest all-round electron-donating profile of the set. It adsorbs flat on Cu in the physisorption regime (E_ads ≈ -9 kJ/mol). The lead holds across all 2 descriptor bases evaluated (geometry and protonation). This is a computational screening prediction requiring electrochemical confirmation (see the Method section and caveats).
Pyrazolylnucleoside methoxy
Pyrazolylnucleoside methyl
Pyrazolylnucleoside bromo
Pyrazolylnucleoside fluoro
Pyrazolylnucleoside chloro
Gap (eV)
5.457 ✓
5.655
5.768
6.047
5.851
ΔN
0.217
0.15
0.169
0.174
0.17
Dipole (D)
9.531
7.806
5.526
7.284
5.582
E_ads (kJ/mol)
-9.13
-7.66
-10.52 ✓
-9.23
-9.15
Cu–O (Å)
3.35
3.35
3.25
3.65
3.35
Score
1.658 ✓
-0.067
-0.489
-0.497
-0.606
Ranking basis
Top candidate
force-field geometry, neutral
Pyrazolylnucleoside methoxy
force-field geometry, pH-weighted
Pyrazolylnucleoside methoxy
Lead robust: the same candidate tops all 2 descriptor bases (geometry and protonation).
Scored on three independent axes of the canonical basis (force-field geometry, pH-weighted; z-scored; higher = stronger): the HOMO–LUMO gap, the Lukovits ΔN (electron donation to the metal) and the dipole (a weak tie-breaker — its direction vs efficiency is disputed). The geometry / protonation panels below are a sensitivity check, not separate rankings. E_ads and the Cu–O distance validate the lead, they do not enter the score. Full method: docs/pipeline.md.
3. DFT electronic descriptors
Modelled moleculesFrontier-orbital energies vs the metal work function
3.3 Species in the acidic medium (protonated cation)
Descriptor
Pyrazolylnucleoside methyl+H+
Pyrazolylnucleoside methoxy+H+
Pyrazolylnucleoside fluoro+H+
Pyrazolylnucleoside chloro+H+
Pyrazolylnucleoside bromo+H+
Formula
C17H20N3O3+
C17H20N3O4+
C16H17FN3O3+
C16H17ClN3O3+
C16H17BrN3O3+
HOMO (eV)
-6.918
-6.483
-6.914
-6.874
-6.851
LUMO (eV)
-1.265
-1.026
-0.866
-1.022
-1.082
Gap ΔE (eV)
5.653
5.456
6.048
5.852
5.769
η hardness (eV)
2.827
2.728
3.024
2.926
2.884
σ softness (1/eV)
0.354
0.367
0.331
0.342
0.347
χ electronegativity (eV)
4.092
3.755
3.89
3.948
3.967
ω electrophilicity (eV)
2.961
2.584
2.502
2.663
2.727
ΔN
0.15
0.217
0.174
0.17
0.169
E_back-donation (eV)
-0.707
-0.682
-0.756
-0.732
-0.721
Dipole (D)
TNC
-1.797
-2.142
-1.985
-1.767
-1.722
Protonated +1 cation descriptors in 1 M HCl; a component of the pH-weighted canonical basis (see the Summary), shown here on its own.
3.4 Speciation in 1 M HCl (pH ≈ -0.0)
0% neutral / 100% protonated at this pH — the protonated form dominates. Population-weighted descriptors (the speciation axis of the ranking ensemble; the headline ranks on the canonical basis):
Descriptor
Pyrazolylnucleoside methyl
Pyrazolylnucleoside methoxy
Pyrazolylnucleoside fluoro
Pyrazolylnucleoside chloro
Pyrazolylnucleoside bromo
Formula
C17H19N3O3
C17H19N3O4
C16H16FN3O3
C16H16ClN3O3
C16H16BrN3O3
HOMO (eV)
-6.918
-6.482
-6.913
-6.873
-6.85
LUMO (eV)
-1.263
-1.025
-0.866
-1.022
-1.082
Gap ΔE (eV)
5.655
5.457
6.047
5.851
5.768
η hardness (eV)
2.827
2.728
3.023
2.926
2.884
σ softness (1/eV)
0.354
0.366
0.331
0.342
0.347
χ electronegativity (eV)
4.09
3.754
3.889
3.948
3.966
ω electrophilicity (eV)
2.959
2.582
2.502
2.663
2.727
ΔN
0.15
0.217
0.174
0.17
0.169
E_back-donation (eV)
-0.707
-0.682
-0.756
-0.731
-0.721
Dipole (D)
7.806
9.531
7.284
5.582
5.526
TNC
-1.798
-2.144
-1.986
-1.768
-1.723
3.5 Local reactivity (Fukui)
Strongest electron-donating oxygens (highest f⁻) per molecule:
pyrazolylnucleoside methyl — best posepyrazolylnucleoside methoxy — best posepyrazolylnucleoside fluoro — best posepyrazolylnucleoside chloro — best posepyrazolylnucleoside bromo — best pose
pyrazolylnucleoside methyl — MC annealingpyrazolylnucleoside methoxy — MC annealingpyrazolylnucleoside fluoro — MC annealingpyrazolylnucleoside chloro — MC annealingpyrazolylnucleoside bromo — MC annealing
DFT level: B3LYP/def2-SVP (ddCOSMO:water). Global descriptors come from the frontier-orbital energies via Koopmans' theorem; ΔN uses the metal work function with η(metal) = 0. The Monte-Carlo and Brownian-MD stages use a classical van-der-Waals adsorption model — a physics-based screening surrogate, not a substitute for periodic DFT or for electrochemical validation. The composite ranking is a heuristic that orders candidates; it does not prove inhibition. Full methodology: docs/pipeline.md; validation record: docs/validation.md.