Substrate Cu(111) | Medium 1 M HNO3 | DFT level B3LYP/6-311++G(d,p) (ddCOSMO:water) | Generated 2026-07-18 19:37
The molecules modelled here are screened in silico as representative candidates, not a verified analysis of any real sample. Confirm the actual composition experimentally (e.g. by LC-MS/GC-MS) before drawing firm conclusions.
1. Overview
corrosim pipeline
2. Summary & ranking
Of the 4 molecules screened, 1-phenyl-5-mercaptotetrazole ranks highest on the composite electronic score (+0.88), which averages three independent axes — a small HOMO–LUMO gap (5.11 eV), the Lukovits ΔN and the molecular dipole — the strongest all-round electron-donating profile of the set. It adsorbs flat on Cu in the physisorption regime (E_ads ≈ -10 kJ/mol). The lead holds across all 2 descriptor bases evaluated (geometry and protonation). This is a computational screening prediction requiring electrochemical confirmation (see the Method section and caveats).
1-Phenyl-5-mercaptotetrazole
5-Aminotetrazole
5-Phenyltetrazole
Tetrazole
Gap (eV)
5.107 ✓
5.44
5.268
7.186
ΔN
0.088
0.153
0.108
-0.039
Dipole (D)
6.832
3.109
2.772
2.946
E_ads (kJ/mol)
-10.26 ✓
-4.48
-9.09
-3.76
Cu–O (Å)
Score
0.88 ✓
0.318
0.109
-1.308
Ranking basis
Top candidate
force-field geometry, neutral
1-Phenyl-5-mercaptotetrazole
force-field geometry, pH-weighted
1-Phenyl-5-mercaptotetrazole
Lead robust: the same candidate tops all 2 descriptor bases (geometry and protonation).
Scored on three independent axes of the canonical basis (force-field geometry, pH-weighted; z-scored; higher = stronger): the HOMO–LUMO gap, the Lukovits ΔN (electron donation to the metal) and the dipole (a weak tie-breaker — its direction vs efficiency is disputed). The geometry / protonation panels below are a sensitivity check, not separate rankings. E_ads and the Cu–O distance validate the lead, they do not enter the score. Full method: docs/pipeline.md.
3. DFT electronic descriptors
Modelled moleculesFrontier-orbital energies vs the metal work function
3.1 Frontier-orbital isosurfaces (HOMO / LUMO)
tetrazole HOMO5-aminotetrazole HOMO5-phenyltetrazole HOMO1-phenyl-5-mercaptotetrazole HOMO
3.3 Species in the acidic medium (protonated cation)
Descriptor
Tetrazole+H+
5-Aminotetrazole+H+
5-Phenyltetrazole+H+
1-Phenyl-5-mercaptotetrazole+H+
Formula
CH3N4+
CH4N5+
C7H7N4+
C7H7N4S+
HOMO (eV)
-10.733
-8.127
-7.736
-7.704
LUMO (eV)
-3.457
-3.167
-3.301
-2.619
Gap ΔE (eV)
7.276
4.96
4.435
5.085
η hardness (eV)
3.638
2.48
2.217
2.542
σ softness (1/eV)
0.275
0.403
0.451
0.393
χ electronegativity (eV)
7.095
5.647
5.518
5.162
ω electrophilicity (eV)
6.918
6.429
6.867
5.24
ΔN
-0.296
-0.143
-0.13
-0.044
E_back-donation (eV)
-0.909
-0.62
-0.554
-0.636
Dipole (D)
TNC
-0.299
-0.843
-3.228
-1.487
Protonated +1 cation descriptors in 1 M HNO3; a component of the pH-weighted canonical basis (see the Summary), shown here on its own.
3.4 Speciation in 1 M HNO3 (pH ≈ -0.0)
97% neutral / 3% protonated at this pH — the neutral form dominates. Population-weighted descriptors (the speciation axis of the ranking ensemble; the headline ranks on the canonical basis):
Descriptor
Tetrazole
5-Aminotetrazole
5-Phenyltetrazole
1-Phenyl-5-mercaptotetrazole
Formula
CH2N4
CH3N5
C7H6N4
C7H6N4S
HOMO (eV)
-8.816
-6.825
-7.0
-7.046
LUMO (eV)
-1.63
-1.385
-1.732
-1.939
Gap ΔE (eV)
7.186
5.44
5.268
5.107
η hardness (eV)
3.593
2.72
2.634
2.554
σ softness (1/eV)
0.278
0.368
0.38
0.392
χ electronegativity (eV)
5.223
4.105
4.366
4.493
ω electrophilicity (eV)
3.811
3.121
3.643
3.955
ΔN
-0.039
0.153
0.108
0.088
E_back-donation (eV)
-0.898
-0.68
-0.658
-0.638
Dipole (D)
2.946
3.109
2.772
6.832
TNC
-0.598
-0.995
-3.037
-1.82
3.5 Local reactivity (Fukui)
Strongest electron-donating oxygens (highest f⁻) per molecule:
DFT level: B3LYP/6-311++G(d,p) (ddCOSMO:water). Global descriptors come from the frontier-orbital energies via Koopmans' theorem; ΔN uses the metal work function with η(metal) = 0. The Monte-Carlo and Brownian-MD stages use a classical van-der-Waals adsorption model — a physics-based screening surrogate, not a substitute for periodic DFT or for electrochemical validation. The composite ranking is a heuristic that orders candidates; it does not prove inhibition. Full methodology: docs/pipeline.md; validation record: docs/validation.md.